Thursday, August 26, 2010

Where is Everybody?

"New Ideas" - That's what make our life interesting. Here is one... I copied exactly from the source

A new model shows how the spread of ET civilisations can undergo phase changes, providing a deeper insights into the Fermi Paradox.

In 1950, the Italian physicist Enrico Fermi raised the question that now bears his name. If there are intelligent civilisations elsewhere in the Universe with technologies that far surpass our own, why do we see no sign of them?

Since then, the so-called Fermi Paradox has puzzled astronomers and science fiction writers alike. And although there are no shortage of ways to approach the problem (this blog has covered them here and here for example), nobody has come up with a convincing explanation. .

Now there is another take on the problem thanks to a new approach by Igor Bezsudnov and Andrey Snarskii at the National Technical University of Ukraine.

Their approach is to imagine that civilisations form at a certain rate, grow to fill a certain volume of space and then collapse and die. They even go as far as to suggest that civilisations have a characteristic life time, which limits how big they can become.

In certain circumstances, however, when civilisations are close enough together in time and space, they can come into contact and when this happens the cross-fertilisation of ideas and cultures allows them both to flourish in a way that increases their combined lifespan.

Bezsudnov and Snarskii point out that this process of spreading into space can be easily modelled using a cellular automaton. And they've gone ahead and created their own universe using a 10,000 x 10,000 cell automaton running over 320,000 steps.

The parameters that govern the evolution of this universe are simple: the probability of a civilisation forming, the usual lifespan of such a civilisation and the extra bonus time civilisations get when they meet.

The result gives a new insight into the Fermi Paradox. Bezsudnov and Snarskii say that for certain values of these parameters, the universe undergoes a phase change from one in which civilisations tend not to meet and spread into one in which the entire universe tends to become civilised as different groups meet and spread.

Bezsudnov and Snarskii even derive an inequality that a universe must satisfy to become civilised. This, they say, is analogous to the famous Drake equation which attempts to quantify the number of other contactable civilisations in the universe right now.

The question of course is what kind of universe do we live in: are the parameters here ripe for the evolution of a single cosmic civilisation or are we condemned to be forever alone?

Bezsudnov and Snarskii say there's only one way to find out: wait and see.

Thanks to the source

Ref:arxiv.org/abs/1007.2774

Thursday, June 3, 2010

The Fire

Yesterday I had a nice time with my friends. We had camp fire at near by lake. I don't exactly remember when I have seen the real fire last time. Today no one requires fire, we all have electrical heating, or heating in some other way. We miss the opportunity to look at the fire and experience one of the elemental force of the nature. Whenever I go to beach, I feel a strange kind of happiness. Its not just because of the beauty of the beach, but a much deeper understanding of the importance of the elemental forces as a physicist. I had the same feeling yesterday. I saw the fire as well as the water in front of me. I fell in silence. It gave me warmth and comfort. I don't know how to express my feeling. It was simply great......

Sunday, April 4, 2010

Open source image processing

Yesterday we visited Hindu temple at Hamm. It's not quite often that you come across Hindu temples out side India. We took photographs using Cannon EOS 400D SLR camera. I took the raw image and processed using Open source software GIMP. There is a common misconception that these free softwares are no way comparable to the professional softwares. I agree the fact that open source user interface may not looks good, it may have bugs in it. But still its capable of producing quality outputs. I knew only few functions in GIMP. I feel that is sufficient to process my photos.


Here is an example, I took the worst photo from the trip and tried to get best out of it. This one is taken with wrong camera settings

I used GIMP to process the raw data and got this photo


These photos are symbolic representation that the darkness create by Microsoft and Apple will soon be removed by the light from the free(as in freedom, not in terms of money) softwares.




Here is the FSF song from Richard Stallman, software freedom fighter..



Be proud to be an open source user.. I DO.......